Intuitive versus Intravenous Truth

By Bettina Zumdick

As we have just stepped over the threshold into a new age—the age of Aquarius—this transition is fraught with difficulties. This new age is expected to herald peace and brotherhood/sisterhood of all and love freely given and received. However, we are finding ourselves at a distinct crossroads where danger, suspicion, and rage seem to be lurking everywhere.

The transition from fear to love is not going well. And wouldn’t a worldwide test—like Covid—be the perfect examination to demonstrate to all of us clearly whether we, as the whole of humanity, are ready for the next level up in the Spiral of History, or whether we will need another 25,000 years repetition until we reach this crossroads again, and perhaps then can make more loving choices?

In my opinion, it is of utmost importance that each of us individually becomes coherent within ourselves now, so that we may directly access the truth of what is going on in the world and not a picture fed to us “intravenously” by the media or any other outside-of-self source. What do I mean by becoming coherent? I mean that we, as individuals, have the innate ability to access the truth as our Body, Soul, and Spirit knows it—not only our “regular” waking conscious awareness. The frequencies around our world have increased to such a high degree that it is becoming increasingly easier to access information directly via our own super-computer antenna: the body—whose cells are constantly receiving a livestream from our environment.

Most of us older folks, however, very soon after birth have forgotten how to connect to, and access, the data that is always livestreamed to our cells. As a result, the actual, true information we are receiving via our body cells from all over the world at any given moment promptly gets deposited into the sub- and unconscious mind, never to be seen again. This means we can easily be deceived, frightened, and manipulated, and making any true assessments can become a laborious effort of research and fact finding.

As it stands now, the authorities are telling everyone what is safe and appropriate; meanwhile, from my perspective, there is room for questioning. Trained as a food scientist, I remember clearly, that by the time we graduated we had a choice: joining a large food corporation and being paid big bucks or going the other route of trying to raise people’s awareness about food, food additives, food processing, impact on environment, etc. for the benefit of the consumers—and probably never making a lot of money.

Joining a large food corporation means the food scientist has to devise studies and disseminate information that would go along with the “party line,” which means the information disseminated doesn’t necessarily portray the truth of the matter or be in the best interest of the consumers. Ultimately, the profit margin of the company is most often the deciding factor.

Knowing that the money trail usually lies at the heart of the matter, I encourage everyone to dig for themselves and then make an assessment. These days this means having to ferret out alternative ways to access your information, as our popular research tools have censored a lot of information recently.

Are the vaccines safe or not? Everyone has to make that choice for him/herself. Everyone’s body is different and has a specific history. And yes, many people are wishing to make the right choice from the heart. Some people’s perspective is: “I am getting vaccinated, because I believe my choice will help humanity,” and truly that is a laudable attitude. Other people choose not to participate in the vaccination, believing that it will ultimately harm them and humanity, and thus they are speaking out against it.

However, people who are not willing to get vaccinated are being shamed and worse: people/physicians/scientists speaking out against the vaccines are being smeared and labeled “charlatans,” and their freedom of speech is being curtailed. Is this an earmark of a free country, or at least a country with free speech? Or are we so ruled by fear, that people and government calls for more and more rules and regulations will keep mounting until we find ourselves living in George Orwell’s prophetic novel 1984?